Stacey Graham
1 year ago
the free version is almost unusable because of the ads
André Hansson
11 months ago
Expensive and unstable. Also it's full of ads. I can't recommend.
Timmef
1 year ago
Have to wait til an ads done to start taking photos. Would be happy to pay to get rid of them but theres no option.
Mouladino Panhwar (Technical)
1 year ago
should be better and some other features like filters emoji and other specialy vivid filter.
Filzah Amirah Zahwa
1 year ago
the photo results are similar to the camera on the iPhone, good!!
ayur ajay soni
11 months ago
i opened for the first time i found too much ads within 5 seconds. also it is not working .in my phone
Jason Eleftheriou
1 year ago
subscription based app al lot of adds, and if you want to use the premium function you jave to pay monthly 5/6 buks.
Aaron Davis
11 months ago
I don't mind paying for software but a $5 WEEKLY subscription forever? Absolutely not.
nyan04
1 year ago
constant bombardment of ads (that they want to make you pay a WEEKLY SUBSCRIPTION to remove) and appears to just be based off open camera anyway. avoid at all costs
njh93
1 year ago
Cameras should not have ads, idc. And a one time payment MAYBE, but a subscription based service??? Lol kick rocks
Anthony Gabriel
1 year ago
Downloaded this to test it as it was recommended. My phone's camera gives better quality lol. It makes a 64mp cam look like 5mp.
John Love
1 year ago
Excellent camera app. Superior to Galaxy camera app. Ads are a bit horrifying. Would love to be able to pay one time for the premium app with no ads.
Stephen Wear
11 months ago
Too many annoying adds to make you miss a shot, I'll stick with open camera, it has the same features and no ads plus you get all the featurea for free
Alex Harness
1 year ago
I have never seen more ads in an app than this one. I don't support apps that intentionally make their free version downright worthless so you'll buy the paid version.
Pete Coleman
1 year ago
Full of adds. Only get some of the features unless you pay almost £5 a week. Not exactly fully featured, manual control nome existent as far as I could see. Uninstalled after few minutes of tinkering.
Jabber Cookie (Lyra)
1 year ago
This app was alright...until I opened it today and found that the TIMER had been locked behind a PAYWALL. It is now stuck on 10 seconds, I cannot turn it off. I shouldn't need to pay for a subscription to NOT use a timer in a camera app. If you want people to buy your app, make it good, don't try to trap your users
James Hulsmann
1 year ago
Only paid option is a subscription! It's over all no better or worse than the built in cam app, a bit more pixel like I guess. However, suffer ads you have to sit through before taking a picture, or $15.00 sub!!! Hard pass!!!
Jaden Desmond (Flaming Frostbite244)
1 year ago
they ads are a pain and the app layout comes across as incredibly dated. however the photos themselves are good and that's what matters. if they just offered a pay once premium version I'd give them money for that but I'm not paying $5 every single week to use this
Jones
1 year ago
Was talking with someone about how we'd heard Android photos can be improved by having a better app than the native camera one and saw this one recommended on reddit. Ha. Took only two photos with it before the ads became so overwhelming that I un-installed. Those two photos were of my cat and I honestly couldn't tell if they were any better than usual. Not worth the storage space to me, personally.
Dan Todd
1 year ago
Taking photos is about the moment. I saw a bald eagle flying by and went straight to GCam to take a photo of this beautiful moment. I needed to be quick to capture this moment in time. I waited 10 seconds for the in app ad to finish playing and hit the X button and then the app crashed. The bald eagle flew away and I missed the shot. This app is trash and I am so mad. What a waste of potential. Whoever thought to put ads in a camera app should be fired.